Two things drove the rename.
The name was already taken in our corner of the industry. HashiCorp ships a product called Boundary, and it sits close enough to us — backend infrastructure, developer tooling — that the two blur together in search results and in conversation. A name you have to qualify every time you say it is not doing its job.
And we started a company. It is called Wagoe. Having the framework and the company share a name is worth more to us than the cost of the rename — and that cost is never lower than it is right now, before 1.0.
It is pronounced wagooh. The oe is Dutch: the vowel in "boot", not the "oh"
in "go".
The rename is complete and the framework is functionally unchanged — same architecture, same APIs, same behaviour. Only names moved.
What changed
| Before | After | |
|---|---|---|
Namespaces |
|
|
Maven group |
|
|
Artifacts |
|
|
Config keys |
|
|
Environment |
|
|
CLI |
|
|
Website |
boundary-app.org |
wagoe.org |
Installer |
get.boundary-app.org |
get.wagoe.org |
Repository |
github.com/thijs-creemers/boundary |
github.com/wagoebv/wagoe |
MCP resources |
|
|
The old domains and repository URL redirect permanently, so existing links keep working.
Upgrading
This is a breaking change for coordinates, config keys and environment variables. There is no compatibility shim — the rename happened before 1.0, so we took the clean break rather than carrying aliases forever.
-
Update your dependency coordinates:
;; before org.boundary-app/boundary-core {:mvn/version "1.0.0-beta-1"} ;; after com.wagoe/wagoe-core {:mvn/version "1.0.0-beta-1"} -
Rename namespace requires:
boundary.→wagoe. -
Rename config keys:
:boundary/→:wagoe/ -
Rename environment variables:
BND_→WAG_(notablyBND_ENV→WAG_ENV) -
Re-run the installer:
curl -fsSL https://get.wagoe.org | bash
TODO: confirm whether a migration script is worth shipping. The rename was
driven by a scripted, per-phase substitution; the same approach would work for
downstream projects and could be published as a wagoe migrate-from-boundary
command.
One thing that did not change
boundary is still the right word for an architectural seam — the FC/IS
boundary between functional core and imperative shell, the persistence
boundary, the HTTP boundary. Those terms stay. Only the product name moved.
Which is the whole point: the word was always better as a description than as a name. If you find something the rename missed, open an issue at github.com/wagoebv/wagoe.